On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:00:04AM -0500, Pedro Sam wrote:
> On December 17, 2003 10:16 am, stan wrote:
> > NTW, I've got a macro that runs sa-lar, and another that runs spamassian
> > -r. If I run the 2nd one first, I get a message about 0 messages learned
> > from, if I run the first one. Whereas, If I reverse the order, I get 1
> > message learned. So it looks to me that I can't reproduce your error here.
>
> ... sorry, I wasn't clear before ...
>
> reporting and learning both works with "spamassassin -r". BUT!! remember
> that SA markup must be stripped before reporting or learning. Now,
>
> 1. "sa-learn" command automatically strip SA markup before learning, WORKS!
> 2. "spamassassin -r" command claims to strip SA markup before reporting,
> WORKS! (ie it reports the spam without SA markup)
> 3. "spamassassin -r" command claims to strip SA markup before learning, DOES
> NOT WORK!! (ie it learns the spam WITH SA markup)
>
> Why did I suspect that 3 did not work? because I found many tokens in the
> bayes database that could only had come from SA markup. Tokesn like
> "BAYES_99" were considered VERY spammy.
>
> I 'm begging you, can someone please either confirm this problem so we can
> report it, or someone tell me that it's my problem only ...
>
OK, if the problem exists, I should have it. But I'm a newbie here. Tell me
how to check my tokens, and I'll reprt back.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
