Robert Nicholson wrote: > > I noticed the scores you reported were with 2.60. > > I don't understand why your scores as so much higher than mine. > > Do you have any custom rule modifications? > > I will take the message below and run it thru 2.61 now. > > Why do you get more hits?
Your debug output shows you don't have NET::DNS, or otherwise, there's no network checks. The output shows, Bayes doesn't have enough ham or spam to work. You might start with training Bayes - hopefully you've got enough ham, and spam laying around. Bryan ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
