one set of angle brackets.
Anyway I'm not suggesting that this is suitable criteria for determining spam. It's just a reliable
signature for this particular spammer.
On Dec 12, 2003, at 10:09 PM, JRiley wrote:
Anybody who's installed A 2.61
Can you tell me what the score for the following email was
From: Advance in Pay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Need cash in the bank ASAP? Date: December 12, 2003 4:28:24 PM CST To: Robert David Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i'm refering to the spammer who's using double reply-to's with angle brackets.
No scoring for a double reply to address as far as I can see (ran two
tests).
(and you're receiving one right now).
Not that it would matter much, theres nothing to be gained by doubling the
reply to addresses.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
