Next time I snip the SA version too ;) I've posted my moans on this before. It was initially a test setup that worked so well it was deemed production. This a personal time project with no budget or resource allocation. I have managed to co-opt another server and am building a new setup, but it takes time and I am trying to "do it right" with mirrored drives and teamed adapters. At last pass, the Intel iANS required compiled in modules and chocked when DCP instead of a hard-coded IP address and Bastille (www.bastille-linux.org) was not updated for RH9. I believe the latest releases have these issues resolved. Additional I am trying to create an "autobuild" script to create unstable/current/stable UML images. Of course "Fedora" is out now and running "up2date" will soon be a thing of the past. I am probably back in the same boat with Bastille and now have to decide whether to go with "yum" or Debian "apt" to try and automate my builds & updates. It's a full-time project that I can only squeeze a couple hours for and no budget to accomplish it.
Best Regards, Bob -----Original Message----- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 12:46 PM To: SpamTalk Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Another dufus who cant configure their spam software At 11:57 AM 11/24/2003, SpamTalk wrote: >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=TO_MALFORMED version=2.20 and note another one who can't keep their anti-spam software up to date :) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
