Hello Charles, See my stats below -- I developed a rule for this test, and running it against my corpus I found that it matched more ham than spam.
Bob Menschel Friday, November 14, 2003, 9:26:33 AM, you wrote: CG> Hallo! CG> Another spam today, with the infamous empty return path. CG> (Return-Path: <>) CG> But I didn't see any test that was catching this. Is there something CG> legitimate about an empty return path that makes it a bad test? # header RM_hr_NOREPLY Return-path =~ /<>/ # describe RM_hr_NOREPLY Return path is set to empty (common for bounces) # score RM_hr_NOREPLY 0.001 # more ham than spam; # 3s/15h of 33570 corpus; 0s/44h of 39283 corpus CG> - Charles -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free! https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
