The preferred method is any way you prefer. ;) That is really an honest answer. Everyone has their own preferred method and a lot of times it depends on your specific situation. Some people will pipe to a filter shell script, Procmail, maildrop, or spamc directly. I prefer Procmail as it allows me to do more post SMTP processing with the message than the shell script or a direct pipe to spamc. maildrop works well for some people but I honestly am not familiar with it. I would like to hear from someone who has chosen maildrop rather than Procmail just to have a comparison though.
General Postfix Links http://pfortin.com/Linux/PostFix/ http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix/postfix_mailhub.shtml SA Related http://www.advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce.html --Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Robban > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] SMTP gateway/filter > > > I'm pretty new to spamassassin and I've only done a few > spamassassin/postfix installations. My next task is to sett > up some sort of STMP gateway that filters e-mail for spam and > if approved, forwards the mail to "the real" mail server. The > real mail server will probably be an exchange server but we > might also end up with godd ol' sendmail. What would be the > preferred practice in setting up such a thing. Any ideas? > > //robban ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
