It did however use a trick to avoid the standard FROM_AND_TO_SAME so your rule can help out by adding some score.. However, 104.1 is a bit excessive, since there's no white list to over-ride. (Bret is smart and did not whitelist_from himself).
One I've been seeing lately is that use of another name with my address as the sender (eg. "henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>").
Also, I looked at the code for check_for_from_to_same() (EvalTests.pm) and it looks like there's no return statement at the end. Does Perl return 0 by default? (I'm a C coder and return type mismatches are a no-no in that language.)
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
