At 03:00 PM 11/10/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:

This is the spammer trick of saying the email is from you, to you. So it got
Whitelisted.

No it did not Chris.. Read The Fine List of rules it matched.. no WHITELIST_* or AWL rules match this.


X-Spam-Tests: tests=BANG_MORE,BAYES_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,UPPERCASE_25_50

Also, if it was whitelisted, the score would have been much lower than this:
X-Spam-Score: 3.7

It did however use a trick to avoid the standard FROM_AND_TO_SAME so your rule can help out by adding some score.. However, 104.1 is a bit excessive, since there's no white list to over-ride. (Bret is smart and did not whitelist_from himself).

Really, my suggestion to Bret would be to train his bayes on this... BAYES_60 is pretty weak.







-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to