Upon looking at those rules I see al LOT of inconsistencies. For instance, I found these rules that have score of zero(!) (and these are merely the top of a large iceberg)
score CASHCASHCASH 0 score ADDRESSES_ON_CD 0 score BLANK_LINES_90_100 0 score EJACULATION 0 score HERBAL_V+AG+A 0
Not to be rude, but did you even READ my email?
You're still not even thinking about looking at STATISTICS.txt.. you're still looking at the rule name, and not even glancing at how it performs or works.
Until you break yourself of merely looking at the rule name and making reaction based only on the name, you're going to be stuck in the rut of making bad assumptions and not understanding why.
For god[s?] sake, one of the rules in the above set has a S/O of 0.529.. are you joking by suggesting that this rule is a clear indicator of spam??? 48% of emails this rule matches are nonspam emails. It's not a contradiction for it to have a score of 0.. it SHOULD have a score of 0 in the most clear way possible.
Do yourself a favor.. look at the STATISTICS.txt file.. it comes with spamassassin.. it can explain a lot.
Yes there are a lot of rule scores that seem funny at first glance.. but unless you're going to even so much as try to understand what's going on, there's not much point in me trying to explain things to you. You're still making the same mistakes and not learning anything.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
