Johann Spies wrote:
+*1ADBMt-00024Y-00*obt1AWUAynY*
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
maties1.sun.ac.za
X-Spam-DCC: :
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=6.8 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_90,NO_REAL_NAME,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2003 23:29:23.0718 (UTC)
==========================================================
+*1ADBMw-0000Hp-00*xw7dNEoKAO.*
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
maties3.sun.ac.za
X-Spam-DCC: :
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.2 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_90,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.60
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2003 23:29:23.0421 (UTC)
The rest of the headers was identical except for ID's and time
indications. SA on maties1 applied more tests than the one on
maties3. The test result for the bayesian filter wat the same. What
can cause this difference?
At the risk of stating the obvious -- it looks like maties1.sun.ac.za is
performing network checks, and maties3.sun.ac.za isn't.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
