On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 12:11, Alan Hodgson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:13:52AM -0400, VonEssen, John wrote: > > We also assume that they clean their list when address appears to be bad. > > I've seen no evidence of this. The only thing I've seen for certain is > that the older an E-mail address is (once it has gotten on at least one > spammer's list), the more spam it gets. Regardless of whether it's bounced > or not. Spammers are still selling each other E-mail addresses I haven't > used in 4 years.
I agree with that. I see addresses at my client that haven't existed in 5+ years. No one should kid themselves that spam lists are cleaned or that they learn from being blocked at the firewall. Spammers are pests, a blight, and scum of the earth. -- AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Visit the Spamassassin wiki at http://www.exit0.us ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
