You're right, this wasn't the best example of the spurious HTML tag ploy. I got one earlier today or yesterday that was seemingly from this same spammer, which DID have those "bad tags," and when I grabbed this to post to the list I ASS-umed that this would be similar, but you're correct, it's really not.
However, thanks for the analysis. I am not very well-versed in the details of the pattern-matching. I'm just trying to keep the crapola off my small SOHO network. William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E. Polhemus Engineering Company Katy, Texas USA -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith C. Ivey Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 9:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] More HTML Obfuscation: This One Made It Through Bill Polhemus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They use the > spurious HTML tags to break up the text and get it through the > Bayesian filter. I don't see any text actually broken up. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
