--On Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:28 AM -0600 Dan Tappin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a bunch of these hotmail failure notices being tagged as SPAM.
> Does any one have a quick fix for this?
>
> I am guessing a rule to give a low score to the <> return path combined
> with a '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' from header.
>
> I am pretty new to SA so any help on creating a rule would be great. I
> searched the archives but I could not find much on this.
What scores is it hitting, and what version of SpamAssassin?
Running just the headers through 2.55 (yeah we need to upgrade) scores a
whopping 2.4:
Return-Path: <>
Received: from mc2-s18.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.67]) by firewall.orourke.ca
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 720 ID# 1001-62929U100L10S0V35)
with ESMTP id ca for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 04:39:14 -0600
Received: from mc2-f10.hotmail.com ([65.54.237.17]) by mc2-s18.hotmail.com
X-Mail-Format-Warning: Bad RFC2822 header formatting in with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:25:10 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01C3868B939607480000A928mc2?f10.hotmail."
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Return-Path: <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2003 23:25:10.0143 (UTC)
FILETIME=[ECE060F0: 01C386E0]t
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,FAILURE_NOTICE_1,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,
NO_REAL_NAME
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Evan
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
