On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 01:16 PM 9/28/03 -0700, Henry Kwan wrote: > >I've noticed that after upgrading to 2.60, a few spams are slipping through > >without being analyzed. Not a lot, probably only one in a few hundred, but > >it's a bit of a head scratcher. Anyone have any ideas? > > Do you use spamc/spamd? if so, is the message size over the maximum scan limit? >
Hi Matt, Yes, I'm using spamc/spamd. AFAIK, the message is small so I don't think it's hitting the maximum scan limit. I'm running RH 7.3 with Sendmail 8.11.6-27 along with SA 2.60 and Razor 2.36. I'm calling SA from /etc/procmailrc with: :0fw | /usr/bin/spamc It's just kinda weird that some messages don't appear to get processed while others do. Does SA rely on some type of header info that could be munged by spam? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
