On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:34:36 -0500, you wrote: >On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 19:34, Michael W.Cocke wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:29:38 -0700, you wrote: >[snip] >> Running without a virus check in this day and age is probably more >> dangerous than unprotected sex - you're more certain to catch >> something on the computer. > >Hello, > >I must disagree with you regarding this, since I will never (ok, >*never* is a long time, but you get the idea) get a virus, especially >a mail-borne virus (or mail-borne worm or trojan, for that matter). > >Why? I use Linux on the desktop. The same can be said for those >using *BSD, Solaris, etc. > >(Yes, I may get worms from buggy services/daemons, but that's >another topic....) > >Sincerely, >Ron
I usually (around 80% of the time) also run linux on the desktop. Unfortunately, I have to make it possible for the other users of my mail server to use my mail server... In addition, until a whole lot of software vendors get the idea, it's going to be a dual boot world. On top of that, don't assume that linux can't catch something... It's happened before, it will happen again. Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive. ----------------------------------------------------- Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
