On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:29:38 -0700, you wrote:

>How easy were amavisd-new and clamav to set up?

clam and f-prot were easy.  I had to fiddle a bit with the automatic
updates, but that's because I'm a born fiddler.  Amavisd-new was a
little challenging ( If you don't know perl, it will be a lot
challenging) but if you're using spamassassin you already know your
way around enough to get by.  

The hardest part was setting up the spam quarantine directory and
getting sa-learn to process it automatically.

>I already have a postfix + spamassassin (user, not site-wide) setup
>working wonderfully, but I am looking to have some virus protection as
>well, and since I have a few other users on my system (who all use
>SpamAssasssin individually), I might as well switch to a server-wide
>setup.

Running without a virus check in this day and age is probably more
dangerous than unprotected sex - you're more certain to catch
something on the computer.

>Just wondering if you had any links to quick-setup howtos or anything
>like that before I research the documentation of amavisd-new and clamav
>independently.

Sorry, haven't written one yet.  Give me a week or so.  8-)>


>
>Thanks!
>-Paul
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael W.Cocke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 4:47 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [SAtalk] Interesting discovery re:
>spamassassin/mimedefang/sendail.
>
>
>I got completely frustrated chasing the stupid worm of the week thru
>what had essentially become a series of fast hacks, and I decided to
>rework my mail system from scratch.
>
>Sendmail out, postfix in
>mimedefang out, amavisd-new in
>spamassassin, f-prot, and clam stayed the same.
>
>Unless the makeup of the worm spam changed radically during the course
>of today (Tuesday), the new configuration is passing FAR fewer false
>negatives.  I don't keep the old spam and virii messages, so I can't
>quantify it, but my config settings are basically the same as they
>were, and my FNs are down from around 3 per hour to around .5 per
>hour.
>
>Bayes still isn't working - not enough ham and spam fed, this is just
>the standard (mostly, a few custom mods) rule set.
>
>YAHOO!  (no, not the search engine)
>
>Mike-
>
>Mornings:  Evolution in action.  Only the grumpy will survive.
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have
>installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com.  If
>email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, 
>non-attachments.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
>Welcome to geek heaven.
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf
>_______________________________________________
>Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Mornings:  Evolution in action.  Only the grumpy will survive.
-----------------------------------------------------

Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have
installed site-wide spam filters at catherders.com.  If
email from you bounces, try non-HTML, non-encoded, 
non-attachments.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to