Good call, I'm sorry I missed that. What a shame, I was hoping I was on to something, if nothing other than solidifying the MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE rule. Oh well, back to the drawing board!
Mike -----Original Message----- From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:55 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE Hey Mike, The fix is post SP2 which means it was rolled into SP3. A vast majority of the Exchange servers should be at least at that service pack if not SP4 which was released at the end of 2000. --Larry > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Kuentz (2) > There is always a lot of good talk here about different > methods for us to rack up points on SPAM, but I usually don't > see much about identifying HAM and applying negative points. > I don't know if any one is interested, but Exchange 5.5 has a > quirk in it where when you specify it to send a message as > plain text, it will send it as a multi-part mime message as > both HTML and plaintext, regardless. There is a fix listed > in this link > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;222508. > Any body have any good ideas on how to combine this with > MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE? If I'm reading this correctly, you should never > get a plaintext only message from an Exchange 5.5 server unless you > have applied this fix. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
