trey valenta writes: >On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 08:37:59PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote: >> BTW I would suggest instead profiling spamd -- "--lint" is not the >> case you want to optimize for ;) > >Thanks, I'll try that. I realized --lint isn't the ideal test case, but >made the assumption (which might be wrong) that Conf::_parse would apply >to the processes in general.
It would -- but in the spamd case -- which is where performance is key -- it's only run once at startup. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
