----- Original Message ----- 
From: "SpamAssassin Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ian D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] why are scores so high?


> Ian D. wrote:
>
> >We have had some legitimate mail messages that scored higher than
> >anticipated, and it appears that the following tests are the biggest
> >contributors:
> >
> >score BASE64_ENC_TEXT 2.354 1.643 1.544 1.768
> >
> >score MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET 0.638 0.759 0.365 0.0
> >
> >Is base64-encoded text really such a telling sign of spam that it's worth
up
> >to 2.354 points? Is the same true for no character set specified in an
HTML
> >part of a MIME message? We are considering dropping these tests, but
would
> >there be a significant decrease in detection rate as a result?
> >
> >
>
> Well,  @ least  Base64 *IS* 98% SPAM over here, but not always....
> MIME is around 75 percent. What about chaning the score a bit southbound?
>
> S.
>
>
>

Of the 26,000+ messages I have received since enabling the filter, less than
5% had that test match, and a lot of those scored above 10, so I figured the
test was doing more harm than good, but you have a good point, maybe I
should just lower it some.

Ian



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to