What's exactly the problem with Osirusoft at the moment then? Have they actually "blacklisted the entire Internet" (accidentally?) or is that just an overexaggeration?
Should I be zero'ing all of their tests? Daz > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 September 2003 12:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] osirusoft still working? > > > 1. It *is* the case indeed. Look at your email. Since Osirusoft has > blacklisted the entire internet, every one would have that > test flagged, > wouldn't it? Yes. It doesn't, does it? No. Setting it to > 0 disables > the test. > > 2. Even if it *did* run the test, if a test were to score > zero points, > it wouldn't be listed. Therefore, the poster's test is being run, and > it is scoring more than zero points. His changes have not > taken effect. > > 3. User error is why. The original poster isn't giving the > full story. > He never answered whether he restarted spamd. There's something the > user is doing that isn't being told here. By now he's > probably rebooted > his machine in frustration, and it's working fine now. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ralf G. R. Bergs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:47 AM > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] osirusoft still working? > > > > Simon Byrnand wrote: > > > > > At 20:43 4/09/2003 +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: > > > > > >> Jim Porter wrote: > > >> > > >>> score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0 > > >>> score X_OSIRU_DUL 0 > > >>> score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH 0 > > >>> score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY 0 > > >>> score X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE 0 > > >>> score X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC 0 > > >>> From what I understood, this would disable rbl checking of > > >>> osirusoft.com, but I am still seeing lines like this in > > my log file. > > >> > > >> > > >> Wrong. This doesn't disable checking, but it gives the > results the > > >> weight "0", i.e. it doesn't add to or subtract from the score. > > > > > > Sorry, but it's you thats wrong. Setting the score of an > > RBL check to > > > zero *does* disable the test itself, and has be confirmed by the > > > developers on previous occasions.... > > > > If that *were* the case, then kindly explain why the original > > poster still observed the checks being executed. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
