-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bart Schaefer wrote: >> The mechanism I use to determine in which folder the mail will be stored >> is simple: maildrop (a tool similar to procmail) looks for the >> X-Spam-Level header and sorts the mail according to that header into the >> IMAP folders. So the final score counts. > > Instead of looking at X-Spam-Level, look at X-Spam-Status and sort based > on the presence (or absence) of the strings "autolearn=spam" and/or > "autolearn=ham". Put anything that has neither into DontKnow.
Hmmm... Good idea, but that would only make sense in SA >=2.60, since the previously mentioned "safety zone" feature makes it impossible to create a "DontKnow-window" smaller than 8 hits. Thats too much; i'd like it in a size of 3 to 5 hits. Additionally, to sort this way makes the bayes spam filter simply useless. Sorting in this fashion means that it follows the pre-bayes ruleset. What I'm trying to create is a "learning sorter", but if the bayes filter as the "learning facility" cannot influence the sorting, I would have a simple old-fashioned spam filter following a fixed ruleset. cu Dave KLiczbor - -- Every feature is a bug unless it can be turned off. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/V0zQ9gy0Ccu0VlMRAtnOAKCBl+SLA4Pny0wwpxvlt5Izy9YKmACfTL8m BXcDkXWO4HZTZPfur36SY4U= =Iupl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
