Karl Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 2 September 2003 at 13:57:32 -0600 > > On 2 Sep 2003, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > > Karl Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Since I use procmail I have a list of people and lists that I > > > want to receive email from, and most but not all lists, do not have > > > spam. How can I set up SpamAssassin to pass these good lists without any > > > tests? > > > > Either whitelist them in Spamassassin, or else use procmail *before* > > spamassassin. Given how cpu-intensive spamassassin is, I peel off the > > > Excellent idea! I'm using spamd and spamc which it seems is far > less cpu intensive.
Yes, sorry, I was unclear. I'm using "Spamassassin" by running the emails into spamc from maildrop (a procmail-like product). Much better performance, as you say. I may still be working out problems on the protections and user ids, though. -- David Dyer-Bennet, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/> RKBA: <noguns-nomoney.com> <www.dd-b.net/carry/> Photos: <dd-b.lighthunters.net> Snapshots: <www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/> Dragaera mailing lists: <dragaera.info/> ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
