Estimating a machine for another's mail environment is a tricky thing.
Memory *tends* to be more important than CPU.  Personally, even if I could
get away with a P166, I wouldn't.  A box that old has an increased
probability of dieing an unnatural death.  I would at least want a box that
I could support through a vendor.  How important is the Email?  The answer
will determine the level of support needed and dictate your options.

All that aside . . .  I am assuming, maybe incorrectly, that this will be a
gateway.  If it is and you are really intent on using the P166, maybe you
should use two of those boxes and give equal MX weightings so you have a
little redundancy.  You might be able to minimize administration if you use
rsync between the two boxes.  I would prefer 256MB of memory and would feel
uncomfortable with less and would not use less than 128MB - but that is just
me.  Another person on this list is using a 266MHz machine with 64MB RAM and
a max mail flow of 5K/week, not per day.

Message flow is not the only factor though.  Message size also has a
bearing.  I have had servers with lower message flow that just pounded on
mem/cpu utilization because the attachments were so large.  The hardware
requriement for one customer that had 100 users, 5K msgs/day, and 1 MB
attachments was much greater than another customer that had 550+ users, 30K
msgs/day, and msg sizes typically between 200-500KB.


--Larry



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Fraley

> I am planning on putting a Red Hat 9.0 box on our network to scan
> incoming email using sendmail, spamass-milter and spamassassin2.55.
> It will probably handle 3k to 5k messages daily.  Does anyone have a
> recommendations on hardware.  I have an old Pentium 166 that I
> thought about using.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to