Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I presume though that I'd still be wise to keep the timeouts for razor, > dcc, and pyzor ? And speaking of that, do they run in parallel with each > other and/or other network tests, or one at a time ?
One at a bloody slow time. SpamAssassin would be much faster if they were based on DNS. If not DNS, then at least some background-able API like bgsend() in Net::DNS. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, and open http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ source consulting (looking for new work) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
