On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:30:22PM -0700, Kai MacTane wrote: > I take it you want something a little better thought-out than just > > body CHILD_PORN /child pornography/i > [et cetera...]
That seems like a bad idea.
Well, I *did* imply, in the first line of quoted text above, that this ruleset would be poorly thought-out. I certainly didn't expect anyone to take it seriously -- especially not with the score I assigned it (10.0)!
A mail containing the literal phrase "child pornography" is more probably a serious mail about the topic than that will be any kind of advertisement.
Most likely, yes. For the record, I do not recommend using the ruleset I mentioned above; it was meant ironically.
--Kai MacTane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Hey, sister Moonshine, hold me 'til the break of dawn,
Hold me long,
Hold me hard,
Hold me 'til the shadows fade away..."
--The Mission UK,
"Paradise (Will Shine
Like the Moon)"------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
