At Tue Aug 26 04:55:01 2003, Larry Gilson wrote:
>
> Thanks Carlo! Looks like this test would not be good for a relay that
> accepts mail from MUAs. However, it would probably be good if one only
> expects traffic from MTAs - like gateways. I am surprised to see Exchange
> and GroupWise. For Exchange, the OS must not have the default suffix
> configured. Misconfigurations are worth adding a point or two though. I
> have always setup mailservers with a hostname of host.some.domain rather
> than just host. I guess that is not common(?).
>
> Please let me know if anyone disagrees with this line of reasoning.
>From my own collections:
with FQDN with hostname only
ham: 2331 (85.6%) 391 (14.4%)
spam: 1925 (76%) 608 (24%)
While I'm not very good with statistics, this rule doesn't look very
good for distinguishing ham from spam.
Martin
--
Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\
- see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
