On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 07:25:58 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote > Hi Mike, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Vanecek > > > Possibly the attempt is from a spammer with forged > > information? The "to=<me>" address is unique to this list. That > > means that whomever is sending the message got my address from this > > list or the list server. > > I agree with that line of logic. > > > I am now getting three rejects at around the same time. I > > suspect that means the spammer has sent me additional copies of the > > spam. I think I will add a drop in my iptables on that ip address > > and save postfix from having to be concerned with the problem. > > I personally would let Postfix reject based on connect IP. Readerhouse > *seems* to be a legitimate publishing company. Let them deal with possible > bounce problems. You should also contact them in the event that a rogue > employee is creating the problem.
I sent them an email, but have not heard anything back. Meanwhile the packets to port 25 keep coming in. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
