On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:26:49AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote: > But the report doesn't look anything like the old full reports... (which I
As I said, no more full reports in the header.
> You suggested using _REPORT_ (which I will try instead of _SUMMARY_) am I
> right in thinking that will show my customized report template again ? And
> yet in the man page it says:
No, _REPORT_ is just the terse report for the header. There is no
template to modify for the header report.
> Which is implying you only get the terse format using _REPORT_ ? Does that
> mean theres no way to get a report like the 2.55 format I pasted above ?
> :(
Correct, unless you modify code.
> Well I didn't think the verbose report sucked, I liked it :)
Heh. ;) There was a bugzilla ticket about this, and went back and forth,
and finally decided the verbose report should be removed. Sorry.
> report_safe 1 is totally unworkable in the setup we have so I hope
> report_safe 0 doesn't go away anytime soon...
Oh, I don't expect it to. At work I use report_safe 0 as well since I
don't really want to try to explain to strangely non-technical technical
editors and sales staff about looking/restoring from attachments and so on.
> There are several months worth of tokens in there, and the databases of
> the two servers have only diverged for a couple of hours between the time
> I copied it over and that message comming through, so as far as I can see
> the bayes scores should have been much closer if not the same.... any idea
> why that might be ?
Not off hand, you'd have to look at the -D output from both and compare
the probabilities. The 2.60 Bayes is using a new algorithm (I'm not
clear on the details) that better polarizes results, so you tend to see
a lot at really low numbers, a lot at really high numbers, and the rest
mainly in the unknown area.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"4. Alan Greenspan thanks you for ending the recession."
- Top Ten Clues You Have Been Spending Too Much Time Shopping On-line
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
