At 09:21 PM 8/18/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:08:34PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Um, the reduction of overhead caused by using spamd is that the ruleset is
> already parsed...

Actually it's that and to avoid the overhead of all the perl mode
compiles, etc.

> spamassassin -r doesn't (or at least doesn't need to) parse the ruleset, so
> it's already got that benefit built in.


It does though since config lines can be in any file.

Ugh, so I was completely hind-end-backwards on my suggestion of this.


I would have expected spamassassin -r to at least take a lot of shortcuts in processing configfiles.. i.e. once you realize the line is a "body" statement, you could skip to the next line without doing anything else.

Maybe if I knew perl I'd try to hack up a patch, but right now, I don't know perl syntax at all.

Thanks for pointing out my misunderstandings Theo.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to