Is there a way you can take advantage of the loweroverhead of spamd/spamc to report spam as opposed to having to use spamassassin -r?
Um, the reduction of overhead caused by using spamd is that the ruleset is already parsed...
spamassassin -r doesn't (or at least doesn't need to) parse the ruleset, so it's already got that benefit built in.
I don't really see what sensible overhead benefits could be gained from spamd that couldn't be gained in plain spamassassin -r with sensible coding, and as best I can tell from the debug output, spamassassin -rD already skips parsing most of the configs.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
