> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Testing and weighting rules against corpus of
> spam/non-spam
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have written quite a few of my own rules, and would like to 
> test them more systematically than I do now.
> 
> 1. I've seen people commenting on specific rules, saying that 
> a particular rule generates x false positives and y false 
> negatives against their corpus of ham and spam.  How are they 
> running these tests?
> 
> 2. I would like to run my entire rulebase against a ham/spam 
> corpus, and arrive at statistically "best" weighting of 
> rules.  How is this done?
> 
> Cordially,
> 
> Eric hart
> ehart [nospam] npi.net
> 
> 

www.exit0.us has a section on testing that is being worked on. Take a look
at it.

Chris Santerre 
System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper 
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm 
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy
Wonka  


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to