Matt Kettler writes: > At 09:53 PM 8/12/03 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > >If a message body is encoded base64 or whatever, does > >sa-learn properly process the message? I mean, will it > >properly decode the body into "real text" and then process > >the tokens appropriately? > > I'm not entirely sure about the bayes code, but I'd expect it operates on > the same basis as pretty much all the SA rules. > > Base64 is always decoded, even for "rawbody" rules, so I'd be very > surprised if bayes didn't decode this. > > I'd also venture to guess it sees the same post-processed form of the body > as normal "body" rules, which means that HTML tags and end-of-lines are > stripped out too. This would seem to be the format that would make the most > sense and make it harder to obfuscate strings in random ways. I could be > wrong on this part however.
No, correct on both points ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
