> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Does sa-learn process encoded messages? > > > At 09:53 PM 8/12/03 -0700, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > >If a message body is encoded base64 or whatever, does > >sa-learn properly process the message? I mean, will it > >properly decode the body into "real text" and then process > >the tokens appropriately? > > I'm not entirely sure about the bayes code, but I'd expect it > operates on > the same basis as pretty much all the SA rules. > > Base64 is always decoded, even for "rawbody" rules, so I'd be very > surprised if bayes didn't decode this. > > I'd also venture to guess it sees the same post-processed > form of the body > as normal "body" rules, which means that HTML tags and > end-of-lines are > stripped out too. This would seem to be the format that would > make the most > sense and make it harder to obfuscate strings in random ways. > I could be > wrong on this part however. > What about that double encoding trick? I never got a clear answer as to how that was done.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
