Carey Jung writes: > Could somebody explain to me why the BAYES_80 score for local-with-bayes > (5th column, 5.300) is higher than the BAYES_90 and BAYES_99 scores? This > seems counter-intuitive.
This should be a FAQ, if it isn't already. Basically, the GA looks at the overall success rate -- in this case, it's likely that there were one or two FPs on BAYES_90, and it could *increase* overall effectiveness of SpamAssassin by reducing it score, since other rules caught those spams just fine anyway with the lower bayes score. --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
