Ok, makes sense ... I never thought about whitelisting the list for the simple fact that I never had a problem with the messages being marked as spam.
I'll check into the bayes poisoning you mentioned; thanks for the tip! Regards, Matt. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:59 PM To: Matthew Moldvan; 'Andrea Riela'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: *****THIS MESSAGE IS SPAM***** [SAtalk] Problem with "penis e nlargement" :) At 01:02 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Matthew Moldvan wrote: >Hey there Andrea, > >Looks like this was caught by mine (and probably most people's) spam filters >... can you repost the question with the spam attached instead of in the >body? That should help ... Matthew, if you're running this list through SA without any whitelisting you've got serious problems that need fixing... For example.. autolearn will poison your bayes database. It's a matter of course that this list WILL have spam quotes in it, and requires either whitelisting, procmail bypass, or custom rules to avoid tagging it. And it won't matter if it's attached or not, it's still a part of the body, so will still match the same body rules. The reason people always ask for an attachment is so that they can easily feed the complete email, with original headers, into SA to reproduce a problem. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
