Hello Alan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alan premselaar
> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 11:52 PM
>
> On 8/4/03 3:20 PM, "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > The problem is that I saw things like,
> >
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.195-2003-06-30-exp) on
> > screamerX-Spam-Level: ***
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=no
> > +version=2.60-cvs
> >
>
> If i'm not mistaken, "autolearn=no" means that the messages
> didn't meet the
> criteria to be autolearned. certain scores are ignored when checking
> autolearn criteria, such as whitelists. So, I'm thinking that
> this doesn't
> mean the autolearn setting is off, but that the message didn't qualify for
> autolearning.
Ah okay. Thanks. I looked at a few messages, and for those spams above the
autolearning cutoff, you're right, it says "autolearn=spam". Sorry for the
false alarm.
>
> > showing up. The BAYES_99 flag would seem to indicate that the Bayes
> > algorithm is
> > yielding a score in the 0.99 to 1.00 range, but to the best of
> my knowledge,
> > I have Bayes checking presently turned off.
>
> you're running a CVS version. I don't run CVS versions, so I
> don't know for
> fact, but if memory serves, based on misc. other posts to the list, some
> tests may be forced to run during the CVS period in order to do debugging
> and/or appropriate testing. (Someone who has more experience with the CVS
> versions should probably clarify this)
Also makes sense. Thanks. - Gary
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
