On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Ian Douglas wrote:
> > Also Spammassassin -d --lint is only going to say something if you get a
> > syntax wrong. So your doing a great job if you don't get anything. That is
> > what you want.
>
> But I purposely set one of my rules to "awbody" instead of "rawbody" and --lint
> didn't catch it.
>
> -id
Which version of SA are you running?
I just tried the same test with my 2.60-cvs kit and got:
$ spamassassin --lint
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: awbody RAPE_SPAM1
/\bRaped virgin and inocent girls/
The -only- thing I did was to change a 'body' to 'awbody' and the --lint
caught it. Maybe the newer version has a better --lint checker. ;)
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
