-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:37:51PM +0700, Alexander Litvinov wrote: > > The point is, checking the PGP signature is a good way of finding out if > > someone is supposed to be writing to you. If there is a recognizable PGP > > sig, it counts very well (e.g. -4.5) if it's not recognized it counts a > > little bad (e.g. +1.0) > > Hmm, I understand the idea now. I will argue about positive score for unknown > signatures, but negative score for signatures in the my ~/.gnupg is good > idea.
Sure. The main point I was trying to get accross was the negative score for known sigs because it would help compensate for the drawbacks that we've been discussing in this thread. Since some of the spam rules that have been proposed would pick-up PGP sigs, I suggest adding a negative score for known sigs to compensate (and also because a known sig is a high indicator of hamminess). - -- Daniel Carrera | OpenPGP fingerprint: Mathematics Dept. | 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88 UMD, College Park | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (SunOS) iD8DBQE/IhaVnxE8DWHf+OcRApOOAJ93WsCkblomlcatjbRkGr/cmWVyvgCg5/yR TFN6GQi1IiUwHvJUEw4NOWM= =28cr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
