On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Martin Radford wrote: > > If that's correct, I think people on the beta program really should > report it as a bug, irrespective of the fact that a Message-ID is not > technically mandatory.
Lots of headers that SHOULD be present in normal SMTP don't have to be present at message submission time. I think it's fine for the MUA to rely on the MTA to add the message-ID; in fact the MTA is probably better at choosing a good one than the MUA. -- Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/ Mail Support, University of Cambridge Computing Service New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QH ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
