-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:56:26PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> What mechanism did you use to integrate SA into your mail processing?
>
> Your message talks a lot about how you changed SA's settings, and you've
> shown that the command line interface works, but I don't think you've
> actualy correctly integrated SA into your MTA, MDA or MUA.
I know that it was correctly integrated because:
1) It was integrated by my sysadmin, and we a fair bit of prior
testing.
2) It was working for me before, and it successfully caught
>100 spams before I started editing the user_prefs.
The fact that I changed user_prefs might have nothing to do with why it's
not working (like I said, it's only missed the ~4 spams I've gotten since
I started editing user_prefs). But even if I didn't do anything wrong,
that still leaves the question as to why the spam got through.
- --
Daniel Carrera | OpenPGP fingerprint:
Mathematics Dept. | 6643 8C8B 3522 66CB D16C D779 2FDD 7DAC 9AF7 7A88
UMD, College Park | http://www.math.umd.edu/~dcarrera/pgp.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (SunOS)
iD8DBQE/IK2DnxE8DWHf+OcRAsRvAKDYCqUa3Jx6JhGV+7KzDu4l2EtRWQCgjoO8
EbZWGoKktblAX5Abt9e84KM=
=uNAS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
