On Wednesday 09 July 2003 08:51, Chris Santerre wrote: > Cnet has this article: > http://news.com.com/2100-1028-1023740.html?part=dht > <http://news.com.com/2100-1028-1023740.html?part=dht&tag=ntop> &tag=ntop > Lawmakers are debating and opt-in vs.opt-out. Why is opt-out retarded? > > Hi I'm abc spam inc! Buy my junk.....don't want, well then opt-out here. > > *opts-out* spammer gets confirmation of email and someone reading it. > Spammer forms another company next week. > > Hi I'm def spam inc! Buy my junk....don't want, ............. > > Circle continues. opt-out is foolish. Doesn't that seem obvious? > Although my view may be cynical, lawmakers want to keep all things that fuel the economy. As long as they think spam is generation revenue-based tax dollars, they will not stop it.
-- Robin Lynn Frank | Director of Operations | Paradigm-Omega, LLC © 2003 Paradigm-Omega, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or dissemination is prohibited. If the PGP signature is missing, please forward it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Incoming mail with S/MIME or detatched PGP Signatures will be considered unsigned. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
