I don't know that I'm configured correctly on my system, but our relative spam sensitivity scores (required hits) that are pre-set for customers are: 0.5 (Severe), 1.5 (High), 4.0 (Medium), 10.0 (Low). The majority of spam I see tagged by SA w/ DCC and basic checks enabled (no RBL) tends to fall in the 2-7 range. I'm always amazed to hear about scores in the teens and twenties, because I just never see those kinds of scores. Maybe if I install Razor or Phyzor and enabled RBL checks.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Dragoncrest > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Wow, spam with scores as low as 2.1?? > > > I just saw something weird today. I'm running SA 2.55 and > I hit a spam > message that scored as low as 2.1 and I still have yet to figure out > how. It was a blatently obvious spam, but it scored very low. I > know that > a number of members talked about this not too long back, but I didn't > really follow the conversation. Is this something that we'll be seeing > more of, or will 2.6 score these correctly? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft > Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. > Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. > www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
