> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of mikea
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian filtering question
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:45:59AM -0700, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > I'm using 2.53 spamassassin (with Mimedefang and sendmail). 
>  I've got 
> > my bayes database seeded.  When I test spam using 
> "spamassassin -tD < 
> > sample-spam", I get accurate bayes information.  But I have 
> yet to see 
> > the bayes result to show up on a tagged incoming spam.  Do I have 
> > something configured incorrectly(is there a flag I need to 
> switch to 
> > turn it on system wide)?  Should most of the tagged spams 
> also have a 
> > bayes test line in the spam report?  Everything else is 
> working well, 
> > I just can't tell if incoming spams are being bayes filtered.
> 
> This has been asked in the past, and the answer I remember is 
> that at least one spam has to score above 20 to cause 
> Bayesian scoring to become active. There may be a requirement 
> for at least one non-spam to score below -5, too.
> 
> -- 
> Mike Andrews
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tired old sysadmin since 1964
> 

I have done both (+20 and -5) and it is still inactive.

-Matt Thomas



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to