> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of mikea > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 11:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian filtering question > > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:45:59AM -0700, Matthew Thomas wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'm using 2.53 spamassassin (with Mimedefang and sendmail). > I've got > > my bayes database seeded. When I test spam using > "spamassassin -tD < > > sample-spam", I get accurate bayes information. But I have > yet to see > > the bayes result to show up on a tagged incoming spam. Do I have > > something configured incorrectly(is there a flag I need to > switch to > > turn it on system wide)? Should most of the tagged spams > also have a > > bayes test line in the spam report? Everything else is > working well, > > I just can't tell if incoming spams are being bayes filtered. > > This has been asked in the past, and the answer I remember is > that at least one spam has to score above 20 to cause > Bayesian scoring to become active. There may be a requirement > for at least one non-spam to score below -5, too. > > -- > Mike Andrews > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tired old sysadmin since 1964 >
I have done both (+20 and -5) and it is still inactive. -Matt Thomas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk