Hannu Liljemark writes: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:03:00PM +0300, Robert A Nesius wrote: > > > Do you know why spamd doesn't have it's own metric-tracking > > code built in? It seems like such an obvious thing to have > > spamd do on it's own so you could just ask it for reports. > > Beats me... spamd logs to syslog with all the necissary info > so that's the key, I guess. Just gather the data from the logs > and *bang*. Maybe the devel-team doesn't want SA to cover > that area but just focus on whacking spam.
Yes. The main reason there is that, since few of us (the core team) use these metrics, we're not entirely sure what should go into them. Nor is it a priority to us. If you like, I would suggest opening a request-for-enhancement bug at http://Bugzilla.SpamAssassin.org/ with what you reckon would be useful. That way everyone gets to chip in, the conversation is logged, maybe someone can do up a patch, etc. etc., and it fits into our issue tracking so might actually get in ;) --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
