On Wednesday 25 June 2003 10:51 pm, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > We are in the process of setting up a new server and until that is finished > we're hauling our mail down with kmail. We have it piping thru SA. The > problem is that things get awfully slow that way. I belive this is a kmail > problem, not SA. I've whitelisted the mail lists we subscribe to and > regular correspondents, as well as limited the size of the email that gets > piped thru SA.
Hi, I"ve been using SA with Kmail for a couple of months and I don't have that problem at all. (I get around 25 spam msg's every day) I'll tell you what I did which has worked for me. First, create Kmail filters to filter all your HAM msg's . I have like 40 rules (for firends and newsletters I'm subscribed). Then you should use the last two rules for SA. As you can see I don't use the SA whitelist feature (since I"m already filtering ham with Kmail, there's no need to use a SA whitelist). So in my scenario, if the message reaches to the end of my Kmail filter list, it is PROBABLY a spam message (THEN I use SA). The key is to filter emails -as much as you can- with Kmail filters. Leave the SA to the end of the rules list. Ahh! What are you using for scanning msg's? spamc or spamassassin? You should definitelly use spamc. HTH, Jorge ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
