On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:22:42AM -0400, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist wrote:
> > But is 2.60 stable enough for production? or is there a patch for 2.54?
>
> It is stable, but it's still in development for a little while longer.
>
> You can probably apply the patch in the bug to 2.5x, or even do it
> manually since the change is very small.
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "Wouldn't it be neat if there was a new Tom Hanks western/romance film called
> Sheepless in Laredo?" - unknown
>
Am I correct in presuming that 2.55 fixes this thus that's the safest thing
to do for now? Or can/should I run 2.55 with BayesStores.pm from 2.60?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- generated by /dev/dave -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
David Stern University of Maryland
Institute for Advanced Computer Studies
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
