Matt Kettler said: > As for disabling the network checks for auto-learning, that makes sense to > me as well, since the bayes code learns from text tokens, not IPs.
Actually, not quite right, if you're scanning with network tests, it'll do the auto-learn score test with network tests as well. But regarding the use of Bayes in auto-learn determination causing feedback, that's the big danger. BTW, one possible way to avoid FP/FNs getting into the auto-learn data further, is to modify the learn() sub to add to the existing verification steps: - recomputed hits must be < bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam or > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam - for spam, must have 3 head hits and 3 body hits add this one: - previous hits must be < bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam or > bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam that would mean both the existing main score and the recomputed score must agree that the mail is spam or ham. comments? --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk