> -----Original Message----- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:23 PM > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Question on XSPAM report in header. > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:04:17PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > > When the test are shown in the header, they are in > alphabetical order. But > > the Report doesn't seem to be in any order that I can > figure out. How does > > SA decide which rule description order listed in the report ? > > I don't think we sort either, so the report order should be the order > of the test listing which should be the order in which the > hits were made. > > -- > Randomly Generated Tagline: > Boy, I don't know. You gotta be pretty desperate to make it > with a robot. > > -- Homer Simpson > Selma's Choice >
Ah, interseting. My local.cf rules are kind of all over the place. No real order. (I need to fix that!) So I may have a header rule in the middle of a bunch of rawbody rules. Does SA go thru my local.cf and run all the header rules first, or just top down? If top down, is there an order that would give better performance? As far as that sig qoute, it would depend on what the robot looked like! 6 million dollar woman is okay, but Lee majors.....Nah! Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
