ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 16.39 skrev Maciek J. Maciak: > > What *Amavis* version are you using? Because that's the thing that's > > lousing your rules up. Chances are that that's an old version too - grab > > the newest release.
> If I may ask, how exactly is amavis looking at the rulesets for sa ? I > thought it simply passed it on to sa, sa would go and do its tagging > and score according to its ruleset, and then give it back to amavis > for header mods with the new scores, no ? I only started using it after trying the 2 other Postfix alternatives, a simple filter an spampd. I'm a Postfix newbie, with several years of Exim experience. I started learning Postfix because people expect me to support it. My Amavis version is amavisd-new-20030314. It incorporates the SpamAssassin Perl(3) code calls and a lot of the Perl Internet service special modules directly and doesn't use spamc/spamassassin spamd as such. It makes an utter mess of what it does, IMHO (at any rate compared to SA-Exim, which uses spamc/spamd) and the code and configuration are both cluttered-up and hard to understand at first. However, the performance on high-volume sites can be expected to be higher than the filter/spampd alternatives. I need a way of putting line feeds into the spam reports, since they're awful to try and interpret as they are. > I am in the process of upgrading the Postfix, will check version of > amavis too. Did the old versions not work properly ? I've no idea. I started with Postfix 2.0.9 (updated to 2.0.10) and the above Amavis version. I've never used older versions. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw http://www.billy.demon.nl Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
