lør, 2003-03-22 kl. 15:29 skrev Theo Van Dinter: > > If they are indeed news, and 2.60-CVS code contains the same bugs, is > > the 2.60 code changed at the same time? Answer: "Yes, No, Sometimes?" > > It depends. :) Usually.
Thanks (dank-je-wel, Theo). That was the most important. > > some cases. An awful lot of the bugs I'm finding in my 2003-3-17 > > 2.60-CVS are ones reported for 2.5x. > Which bugs? Right now, I know the 1664 bug patches aren't in 2.6 because > we're testing it for 2.52 first. If it works there, it'll go into 2.6. O.k., sorry. This was crushingly subjective. I'm not going to go back and give them one by one - I'll note them if you want. It's just that I thought to myself at (on this list) each reported 2.50 bug: "Goodness me", or thoughts to that effect, "that goes for my 2.60 too." Here's one :-> mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] automatically gets a spam rating of -86.3 when it's CCed to me direct and outside my regex for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (that gets -100). I never put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in any whitelist ... heh. B.t.w., I just updated my CVS install. I have a much better and quicker (command-line CVS) method now than on the website; I just invented hot water. Who should I tell? Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
